PopPhoto.com -- The online home of American Photo and Popular Photography & Imaging magazine

Free Newsletter: Camera reviews,
lens tests, photo news and more!
   

Subscribe

Popular Photography American Photo

My Photo

January 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

« Inside Straight: Optical Miracle | Main | From The Keppler Files: November, 1965 »

April 25, 2007

From The Keppler Files: February 1969

Pop_kepplerfolder_90x55_2

It should be evident to anyone dabbling in single-lens reflexes that total automation is just around the corner. We have gone from the hand-held meter to the built-in but not coupled, to the built-in and coupled to the shutter speed only and thence to the almost universally used through-lens metering system coupled to the shutter speed and aperture controls. We simply center the needle and shoot, often much too oblivious to what exposure we use. If the needle's centered and the exposure's right, who cares if it is f/4 or f/5.6, if it's 1/60 or 1/125 sec? We should care but often don't or we're too careless in operating the camera or just too lazy to look. As a result we're ignorant of whether we've stopped all the action or how much depth of field we've really got. We're letting the machine do our thinking, and since it can't think, our thinking is as often as not, not being done at all.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341ccb9c53ef00d834a188d569e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference From The Keppler Files: February 1969:

Comments

I'm not even much of a fan of evaluative or matrix metering- sure it works, but you have no idea what type of compensation the "Camera" thinks this scene needs! ophs, did I say camera and thinks in the same line!?

My father gave me my first SLR when I was nine years old, back in 1990. It had no autofocus and a busted light meter. The second SLR he gave me (an Olympus OM1) had a poorly working light meter, and if it had autofocus, it was broken. My third SLR (a Canon AE-1) worked a bit better. Then, for a long time, I due to life circumstances, I used a full automated, I couldn't control a thing, cheap dig P&S.

I recently bought a Nikon D80. I was unhappy with it for about two months. Sometimes spot or weighted metering was better than matrix but overall...I wasn't happy. Once I finally turned almost everything else OFF and started manually metering--ta da--much happier. I tend to shoot a lot of taekwondo events--the white, white, white of the uniform and the green, green, green of the mats just throws the camera's metering system out of whack. So much easier to do it myself!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment